Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

ELEKTRA

IMO: 9176577
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 1,965 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Bergen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.88 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Wallenius Wilhelmsen Shipowning Norway AS · part of Wallenius Wilhelmsen

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,035 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

120

Vehicle carrier median 104 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

53.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 62.4 (−14%)

Average speed

15.4 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.7 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

44.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,653 t

CO₂ emitted

23,992 t

Distance sailed

63,888 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,148 h

173 days, 47% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 120 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+20%)

79.6Ranks 458 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 14.4 (+2%)

12.0Faster than 57% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 191 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+245%)

34.7Ranks 467 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU38%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

545 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ELEKTRA
Vehicle carrier median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ELEKTRA
Vehicle carrier median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ELEKTRA
Vehicle carrier median

0.050.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+5%	+4%	+69%	+265%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	+3%	+11%	−49%	−4%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	−5%	−10%	−46%	−21%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	+4%	+12%	+111%	+34%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+9%	+6%	+315%	+8%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.8 kn	−16%	−25%	−79%	+9%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	+2%	+4%	−61%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Wallenius Wilhelmsen Shipowning Norway AS	2,556	8,013	21,336	1,456	14.7	120	191	–
2024	Wallenius Wilhelmsen Shipowning Norway AS	1,444	4,536	12,618	858	14.7	115	52.4	–
2023	not published	2,768	8,763	24,906	1,821	13.7	111	54.7	–
2022	not published	5,422	16,977	46,511	3,202	14.5	117	69.1	–
2021	not published	2,477	7,804	22,082	1,633	13.5	112	51.6	–
2020	not published	549	1,732	5,317	383	13.9	103	47.9	–
2019	not published	3,052	9,555	24,962	1,590	15.7	122	44.1	–
2018	not published	7,653	23,992	63,888	4,148	15.4	120	53.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Wallenius Wilhelmsen Shipowning Norway AS	191	55.4	+245%	467 of 506	DNV	C
2024	Wallenius Wilhelmsen Shipowning Norway AS	52.4	55.3	−5%	150 of 335	DNV	C
2023	not published	54.7	56.6	−3%	196 of 417	DNV	C
2022	not published	69.1	57.7	+20%	304 of 463	Lloyd's Register	C
2021	not published	51.6	59.6	−13%	152 of 459	Lloyd's Register	C
2020	not published	47.9	57.3	−16%	125 of 449	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2019	not published	44.1	59.0	−25%	47 of 426	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	53.4	62.4	−14%	114 of 434	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.