Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC INGRID

IMO: 9181651
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 29,494 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.50 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 33,945 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

205

Container median 174 kg/nm (+17%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−0%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

78.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,482 t

CO₂ emitted

63,953 t

Distance sailed

100,055 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,280 h

262 days, 72% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 174 kg/nm · median 177 (−2%)

78.8Ranks 1,080 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 13.3 (+2%)

9.1Faster than 55% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+13%)

7.22Ranks 1,254 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports57%
From the EU19%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,874 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC INGRID
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC INGRID
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC INGRID
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	−6%	−2%	+258%	−29%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−9%	−8%	−84%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.5 kn	−2%	−12%	−10%	+38%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	+6%	+8%	−14%	+16%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	−3%	−5%	−8%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−1.4 kn	−1%	−10%	−11%	−0%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.8 kn	−5%	+7%	+21%	−4%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	6,175	19,302	35,529	2,603	13.6	174	18.4	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	1,836	5,773	9,914	758	13.1	185	25.9	–
2023	not published	12,903	40,658	63,171	4,891	12.9	204	27.5	–
2022	not published	14,578	45,972	69,974	4,847	14.4	208	19.9	–
2021	not published	15,962	50,300	81,585	5,713	14.3	196	17.2	–
2020	not published	18,010	56,750	88,979	6,136	14.5	202	18.8	–
2019	not published	20,482	63,953	100,055	6,280	15.9	205	18.8	–
2018	not published	17,905	55,949	82,803	5,875	14.1	216	19.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	18.4	16.3	+13%	1,254 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	25.9	17.5	+48%	1,356 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	27.5	19.4	+42%	1,276 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	19.9	19.1	+4%	936 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	17.2	17.9	−4%	851 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	18.8	17.6	+7%	956 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	18.8	18.9	−0%	890 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	19.6	20.2	−3%	815 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.