Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC MATILDE V

IMO: 9181663
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 29,285 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MSC MATILDE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 26,019 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

187

Container median 182 kg/nm (+3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+12%)

Average speed

14.5 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

65.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,844 t

CO₂ emitted

59,199 t

Distance sailed

100,628 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,923 h

288 days, 79% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 185 kg/nm · median 177 (+5%)

78.8Ranks 1,177 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.0 kn · median 13.3 (+5%)

9.1Faster than 61% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+22%)

7.22Ranks 1,338 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU43%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,006 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC MATILDE V
Container median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC MATILDE V
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC MATILDE V
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+10%	+12%	−9%	+17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−3.6 kn	+24%	−2%	+2,819%	+85%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+4.0 kn	−22%	+1%	−89%	−51%	4.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2022	−0.8 kn	−1%	−7%	−46%	−13%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−6%	−8%	−60%	−4%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	11,641	36,541	62,827	4,478	14.0	185	19.9	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	11,620	36,435	69,287	5,005	13.8	168	17.0	–
2023	not published	321	1,001	2,374	136	17.4	135	9.20	–
2022	not published	3,845	12,143	22,043	1,644	13.4	174	18.8	–
2019	not published	7,174	22,512	40,716	2,865	14.2	176	21.6	–
2018	not published	18,844	59,199	100,628	6,923	14.5	187	22.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	19.9	16.3	+22%	1,338 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	17.0	17.5	−3%	955 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	9.20	19.4	−53%	323 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	18.8	19.1	−2%	896 of 1,825	DNV	C
2019	not published	21.6	18.9	+15%	1,026 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	22.6	20.2	+12%	958 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.