Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC MASHA 3

IMO: 9188219
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 15,382 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 15.13 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,911 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

105

Container median 182 kg/nm (−42%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

27.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+37%)

Average speed

9.3 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−33%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,470 t

CO₂ emitted

14,042 t

Distance sailed

42,637 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,606 h

192 days, 53% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 85.2 kg/nm · median 177 (−52%)

78.8Ranks 336 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 8.5 kn · median 13.3 (−36%)

9.1Faster than 7% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+7%)

7.22Ranks 1,181 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports48%
From the EU24%
Into the EU22%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

840 t

6.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC MASHA 3
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC MASHA 3
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC MASHA 3
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−11%	−13%	+40%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.4 kn	+8%	−7%	−22%	−3%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	+1%	+13%	−3%	−13%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.6 kn	−10%	−24%	−11%	−19%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+12%	+13%	−3%	+28%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+4%	+6%	+5%	+7%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	−20%	−12%	+5%	−34%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	3,719	11,677	43,677	5,129	8.5	85.2	17.4	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	2,986	9,337	31,113	3,597	8.6	96.0	17.2	–
2023	not published	3,525	11,127	39,745	3,973	10.0	88.7	17.7	–
2022	not published	3,590	11,333	40,924	4,573	8.9	87.7	20.2	–
2021	not published	4,487	14,169	45,822	4,368	10.5	97.9	25.0	–
2020	not published	4,151	13,101	47,278	4,565	10.4	87.8	19.5	–
2019	not published	3,786	11,816	44,882	4,431	10.1	84.3	18.3	–
2018	not published	4,470	14,042	42,637	4,606	9.3	105	27.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	17.4	16.3	+7%	1,181 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	17.2	17.5	−2%	961 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	17.7	19.4	−9%	856 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	20.2	19.1	+6%	953 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	25.0	17.9	+40%	1,177 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	19.5	17.6	+11%	999 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	18.3	18.9	−3%	862 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	27.7	20.2	+37%	1,117 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.