Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

BELGIA SEAWAYS

IMO: 9188233
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 2,814 t
Flag (estimated): Lithuania
Port of registry: Klaipeda
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.34 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel
Former names: SCHIEBORG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: AB DFDS Seaways · part of DFDS

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,415 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

105

Ro-ro median 109 kg/nm (−4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

98.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 104 (−5%)

Average speed

6.2 kn

Ro-ro median 14.8 kn (−58%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,591 t

CO₂ emitted

8,293 t

Distance sailed

24,710 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,982 h

166 days, 45% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 83.2 kg/nm · median 105 (−20%)

56.6Ranks 54 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 14.4 (−10%)

10.9Faster than 28% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 87.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (−8%)

47.4Ranks 105 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports84%
From the EU4%
Into the EU5%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

661 t

8.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BELGIA SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BELGIA SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BELGIA SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

40.060.080.0100120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−14%	−18%	+116%	−25%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−1.1 kn	+10%	+3%	−56%	−2%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	+4%	+5%	−22%	+23%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+8.2 kn	−20%	+87%	+231%	−1%	8.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.4 kn	+15%	−26%	−57%	+3%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−5.9 kn	+5%	−35%	−45%	+56%	5.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	−3%	+31%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	AB DFDS Seaways	5,046	14,959	60,629	4,706	12.9	83.2	87.7	–
2024	AB DFDS Seaways	2,698	8,607	28,016	2,057	13.6	96.3	117	–
2023	not published	5,581	17,639	63,875	4,356	14.7	87.4	120	–
2022	not published	6,854	21,782	81,680	5,662	14.4	83.9	97.3	–
2021	not published	2,591	8,293	24,710	3,982	6.2	105	98.3	–
2020	not published	5,309	16,812	58,070	6,058	9.6	91.4	95.4	–
2019	not published	9,115	28,394	105,030	6,795	15.5	86.8	61.3	–
2018	not published	9,238	28,782	108,792	7,025	15.5	84.9	46.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	AB DFDS Seaways	87.7	95.2	−8%	105 of 235	DNV	B
2024	AB DFDS Seaways	117	97.5	+20%	125 of 220	DNV	C
2023	not published	120	109	+10%	120 of 221	DNV	C
2022	not published	97.3	90.6	+7%	126 of 223	DNV	C
2021	not published	98.3	104	−5%	102 of 219	Verifavia	C
2020	not published	95.4	103	−7%	105 of 238	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	61.3	90.9	−33%	49 of 271	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	46.7	91.0	−49%	25 of 260	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.