Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

OPTIMA SEAWAYS

IMO
9188427
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Klaipeda
Technical efficiency
EEXI 22.42 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: AB DFDS Seaways · part of DFDS

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
147.6 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (−2%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
3,241
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+472%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
63.36
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−75%)
Average speed
18.9 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+20%)
Fuel per day at sea
66.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
14,937 t
CO₂ emitted
46,696 t
47,430 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
101,197 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,362 h
223 days, 61% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 147.6 kg/nm · median 150.2 (−2%)
69.3Ranks 195 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 18.9 kn · median 15.8 (+20%)
12.0Faster than 76% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 3,241.48 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+472%)
66.76Ranks 396 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 63.36 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (−75%)
48.59Ranks 51 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports96%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU4%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (46,696 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
4.3%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.8 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • OPTIMA SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • OPTIMA SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • OPTIMA SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • OPTIMA SEAWAYS
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−0.4 kn−1%−3%+10%−15%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024+0.1 kn−1%−0%−20%+136%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023+4.2 kn+4%+32%+88%+73%4.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−2.7 kn−2%−17%−27%+15%2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+1.1 kn+6%+12%−1%−11%1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+0.0 kn+2%+3%+17%+57%Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019−0.1 kn+2%+1%−8%−74%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025AB DFDS Seaways14,93746,696101,1975,36218.9147.6––
2024AB DFDS Seaways13,73242,93692,0624,77119.3149.2––
2023not published17,32554,150114,6655,98819.2151.1––
2022not published8,89827,84361,0804,07315.0145.7––
2021not published12,42338,81683,8674,74617.7148.1––
2020not published11,91537,21784,8995,10116.6140.3––
2019not published9,94731,08572,6274,37316.6137.0––
2018not published10,68733,39179,1944,74516.7134.9172.55–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025AB DFDS Seaways3,241.48566.51+472%396 of 40863.36253.18−75%DNVB
2024AB DFDS Seaways3,824.02546.68+599%379 of 40452.98232.85−77%DNVB+C
2023not published1,617.30680.04+138%342 of 386170.88233.94−27%DNVB+C
2022not published933.85626.32+49%254 of 394131.69252.90−48%DNVB+C
2021not published813.49815.19−0%188 of 377142.42226.00−37%VerifaviaB+C
2020not published915.36750.91+22%211 of 387162.03217.49−26%VerifaviaB+C
2019not published583.47569.03+3%204 of 394128.56222.56−42%VerifaviaB+C
2018not published2,264.85728.92+211%310 of 361–––VerifaviaB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

OPTIMA SEAWAYS (IMO 9188427): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze