Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

CECILIA PAYNE

IMO: 9188881
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 31.34 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

148

Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (−3%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

2,823

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (+315%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

1,615

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (+591%)

Average speed

23.1 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+44%)

Fuel per day at sea

82.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,103 t

CO₂ emitted

29,183 t

Distance sailed

61,419 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,654 h

111 days, 30% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 132 kg/nm · median 150 (−12%)

69.3Ranks 147 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 17.9 kn · median 15.8 (+13%)

12.0Faster than 69% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 2,713 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+379%)

66.8Ranks 394 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 2,730 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+978%)

48.6Ranks 386 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,696 t

5.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CECILIA PAYNE
Ro-pax median

130.0140.0150.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CECILIA PAYNE
Ro-pax median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

CECILIA PAYNE
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,0008,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

CECILIA PAYNE
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,0008,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−7.5 kn	−6%	−34%	+7%	−24%	7.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.3 kn	−5%	+4%	−4%	+27%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.1 kn	+7%	−5%	−11%	−15%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	−5%	−12%	+7%	+31%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	−1%	−3%	−4%	+199%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+2.0 kn	−7%	+0%	+7%	+43,040%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−6.3 kn	+7%	−13%	+49%	−100%	6.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	8,385	26,882	63,325	3,544	17.9	132	–	–
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	8,300	26,611	58,982	2,326	25.4	141	–	–
2023	not published	9,103	29,183	61,419	2,654	23.1	148	–	–
2022	not published	9,583	30,722	69,369	2,648	26.2	138	–	–
2021	not published	9,455	30,314	64,733	2,312	28.0	146	–	–
2020	not published	9,951	31,904	67,285	2,363	28.5	148	–	–
2019	not published	9,963	31,941	62,613	2,366	26.5	159	–	–
2018	not published	6,217	19,933	42,013	1,282	32.8	148	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	2,713	567	+379%	394 of 408	2,730	253	+978%	RINA	A+B+C
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	3,572	547	+553%	378 of 404	499	233	+114%	RINA	A+B+C
2023	not published	2,823	680	+315%	376 of 386	1,615	234	+591%	RINA	–
2022	not published	3,341	626	+433%	384 of 394	2,095	253	+728%	RINA	B
2021	not published	2,556	815	+214%	350 of 377	2,078	226	+819%	RINA	B
2020	not published	854	751	+14%	207 of 387	884	217	+306%	RINA	B
2019	not published	1.98	569	−100%	17 of 394	1.98	223	−99%	RINA	B
2018	not published	7,307	729	+902%	354 of 361	7,308	184	+3,871%	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.