Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ALANDA STAR

IMO: 9189677
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 15,537 t
Flag (estimated): Barbados
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.47 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Logan Ship Management Co

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,784 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

73.1

Bulk carrier median 91.4 kg/nm (−20%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.57 (+51%)

Average speed

12.5 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.5 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

830 t

CO₂ emitted

2,622 t

Distance sailed

11,366 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

912 h

38 days, 10% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 66.3 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−20%)

61.0Ranks 650 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 9.5 kn · median 10.7 (−11%)

8.8Faster than 18% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+71%)

4.80Ranks 3,098 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU17%
Into the EU77%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

58 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ALANDA STAR
Bulk carrier median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ALANDA STAR
Bulk carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ALANDA STAR
Bulk carrier median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.7 kn	+19%	+1%	+22%	+34%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−3.4 kn	−14%	−34%	+38%	−34%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.2 kn	−13%	+3%	−46%	−12%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+1%	+0%	−11%	+33%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+5%	+8%	+43%	+23%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−5%	−8%	−62%	+1%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+3.0 kn	+6%	+41%	−35%	+0%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Logan Ship Management Co	604	1,917	9,118	958	9.5	66.3	13.5	–
2024	Logan Ship Management Co	417	1,303	7,485	670	11.2	55.7	10.1	–
2023	not published	350	1,106	5,418	370	14.6	64.6	15.3	–
2022	not published	749	2,366	10,118	818	12.4	74.0	17.3	–
2021	not published	830	2,622	11,366	912	12.5	73.1	13.0	–
2020	not published	550	1,729	7,928	654	12.1	69.4	10.5	–
2019	not published	1,523	4,764	20,840	1,663	12.5	73.1	10.4	–
2018	not published	2,210	6,911	32,188	3,404	9.5	68.7	10.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Logan Ship Management Co	13.5	7.90	+71%	3,098 of 3,611	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	Logan Ship Management Co	10.1	8.09	+24%	2,159 of 3,089	Verum et Accuratus	A
2023	not published	15.3	8.27	+85%	3,105 of 3,548	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	17.3	8.71	+99%	3,591 of 3,968	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	13.0	8.57	+51%	2,901 of 3,466	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	10.5	8.24	+28%	2,284 of 3,150	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	10.4	8.38	+25%	2,359 of 3,360	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2018	not published	10.4	8.50	+22%	2,362 of 3,384	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.