Navalyze

Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

SAIC ANJI PHOENIX

IMO
9190858
Type
Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried
6 t
Flag (estimated)
Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry
Hong Kong
Technical efficiency
EIV 31.04 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
VERONA
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,759 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
100
Vehicle carrier median 104 kg/nm (−4%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
178
g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 62.4 (+186%)
Average speed
10.7 kn
Vehicle carrier median 14.7 kn (−27%)
Fuel per day at sea
25.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
7,543 t
CO₂ emitted
23,671 t
Distance sailed
75,439 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
7,040 h
293 days, 80% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2018

Set against all 434 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2018 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 100 kg/nm · median 104 (−4%)
82.5Ranks 169 of 434, lowest first131
Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 14.7 (−27%)
12.4Faster than 3% of vehicle carrier ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 178 g CO₂/t·nm · median 62.4 (+186%)
46.2Ranks 405 of 434, lowest first139
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports63%
  • From the EU15%
  • Into the EU17%
  • At berth in the EU6%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,318 t
5.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • SAIC ANJI PHOENIX
  • Vehicle carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • SAIC ANJI PHOENIX
  • Vehicle carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2018→2020+4.3 kn−16%+18%−88%–4.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2020not published7572,3659,01560015.083.943,443–
2018not published7,54323,67175,4397,04010.7100178–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmVehicle carrier medianvs Vehicle carrierRankVerifierMethods
2020not published––––China Classification SocietyA
2018not published17862.4+186%405 of 434DNVC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.