Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

HOEGH ASIA

IMO: 9191876
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 762 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Oslo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.11 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hoegh Autoliners Management AS

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,933 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

113

Vehicle carrier median 108 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

32.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 57.7 (−44%)

Average speed

14.5 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

39.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,510 t

CO₂ emitted

17,237 t

Distance sailed

48,811 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,371 h

140 days, 38% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 105 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+5%)

79.6Ranks 326 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 14.4 (+6%)

12.0Faster than 74% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 430 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+676%)

34.7Ranks 496 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU32%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

429 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HOEGH ASIA
Vehicle carrier median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HOEGH ASIA
Vehicle carrier median

11.012.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HOEGH ASIA
Vehicle carrier median

0.0100200300400500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	−5%	−2%	−11%	+1,032%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−10%	−7%	−49%	−19%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+8%	+7%	−44%	+45%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	−3%	−4%	+19%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+1.4 kn	+11%	+22%	+32%	+5%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	−4%	+9%	+42%	−12%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	−5%	−13%	−16%	−65%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	1,309	4,091	12,487	818	15.3	105	430	–
2024	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	1,547	4,841	14,065	950	14.8	110	38.0	–
2023	not published	3,345	10,497	27,498	1,909	14.4	122	47.0	–
2022	not published	5,510	17,237	48,811	3,371	14.5	113	32.3	–
2021	not published	4,766	15,018	40,858	2,801	14.6	117	39.1	–
2020	not published	3,258	10,381	30,938	2,342	13.2	105	37.2	–
2019	not published	2,403	7,541	21,845	1,876	11.6	110	42.5	–
2018	not published	3,001	9,384	26,051	2,039	12.8	115	123	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	430	55.4	+676%	496 of 506	DNV	B+C
2024	Hoegh Autoliners Management AS	38.0	55.3	−31%	37 of 335	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	47.0	56.6	−17%	111 of 417	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	32.3	57.7	−44%	13 of 463	DNV	C
2021	not published	39.1	59.6	−34%	36 of 459	DNV	A
2020	not published	37.2	57.3	−35%	28 of 449	DNV	A
2019	not published	42.5	59.0	−28%	41 of 426	DNV	A
2018	not published	123	62.4	+96%	376 of 434	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.