Navalyze

Navalyze · Reefer · Ship

BALTIC ERICA

IMO
9194476
Type
Refrigerated cargo carrier
Average cargo carried
4,461 t
Port of registry
Nassau
Technical efficiency
EEDI 25.61 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: OWH Shipmanagement GmbH

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,461 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
80.0 kg/nm
Reefer median 82.9 kg/nm (−3%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
56.19
g CO₂/t·nm · Reefer median 56.80 (−1%)
Average speed
15.8 kn
Reefer median 14.6 kn (+8%)
Fuel per day at sea
30.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,766 t
CO₂ emitted
5,529 t
5,616 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
22,057 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,398 h
58 days, 16% of the year

Within the reefer fleet, 2025

Set against all 109 reefer ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 80.0 kg/nm · median 82.9 (−3%)
55.8Ranks 46 of 109, lowest first117.7
Average speedThis ship 15.8 kn · median 14.6 (+8%)
8.2Faster than 73% of reefer ships16.7
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 56.19 g CO₂/t·nm · median 56.80 (−1%)
36.74Ranks 52 of 109, lowest first140.03
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Reefer medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports8%
  • From the EU49%
  • Into the EU37%
  • At berth in the EU6%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,160 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
6.5%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • BALTIC ERICA
  • Reefer median

Average speed, kn

  • BALTIC ERICA
  • Reefer median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • BALTIC ERICA
  • Reefer median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−0.5 kn−2%−5%+53%−41%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2024−0.2 kn−3%−3%−52%+103%Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025OWH Shipmanagement GmbH1,7665,52922,0571,39815.880.056.19–
2024OWH Shipmanagement GmbH1,1723,68414,38188016.381.594.90–
2021not published2,4917,85929,7931,81116.583.646.66–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmReefer medianvs ReeferRankVerifierMethods
2025OWH Shipmanagement GmbH56.1956.80−1%52 of 109VerifaviaA+C
2024OWH Shipmanagement GmbH94.9058.69+62%90 of 108VerifaviaB+C
2021not published46.6654.99−15%44 of 158VerifaviaC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.