Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ILLINOIS VII

IMO
9197545
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
44,271 t
Flag (estimated)
Liberia
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 10.19 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
SEALAND ILLINOIS
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 52,250 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
241
Container median 174 kg/nm (+38%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
14.4
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−24%)
Average speed
15.1 kn
Container median 13.7 kn (+10%)
Fuel per day at sea
87.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
16,784 t
CO₂ emitted
52,332 t
Distance sailed
69,602 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,617 h
192 days, 53% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,899 container ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 194 kg/nm · median 165 (+18%)
77.6Ranks 1,119 of 1,899, lowest first291
Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 13.2 (−17%)
10.0Faster than 18% of container ships15.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.4 (−29%)
7.34Ranks 663 of 1,899, lowest first51.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports27%
  • From the EU33%
  • Into the EU34%
  • At berth in the EU6%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2,999 t
5.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • MSC ILLINOIS VII
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • MSC ILLINOIS VII
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MSC ILLINOIS VII
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2021→2023−4.2 kn−19%−41%−86%+1%4.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+2.3 kn+13%+33%+36%−2%2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−2.2 kn−12%−24%−40%−4%2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+0.7 kn−5%−0%+4%−7%0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2023not published1,5714,9518,09273311.019413.8–
2021not published13,54342,30656,5103,71815.224013.6–
2020not published8,84627,88841,5343,22212.921313.9–
2019not published16,78452,33269,6024,61715.124114.4–
2018not published16,92652,78666,7954,64414.425315.5–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2023not published13.819.4−29%663 of 1,899DNVB+C
2021not published13.617.9−24%604 of 1,781Lloyd's RegisterB
2020not published13.917.6−21%652 of 1,797Lloyd's RegisterB
2019not published14.418.9−24%604 of 1,788DNVB
2018not published15.520.2−24%571 of 1,705Lloyd's RegisterB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.