Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

PAULINE RUSS

IMO: 9198989
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 1,169 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.59 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "PAULINE RUSS" Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

110

Con-ro median 135 kg/nm (−18%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

618

g CO₂/m³·nm · Con-ro median 11.6 (+5,234%)

Average speed

9.4 kn

Con-ro median 16.0 kn (−41%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,532 t

CO₂ emitted

23,504 t

Distance sailed

68,202 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

7,229 h

301 days, 83% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 65.0 kg/nm · median 105 (−38%)

56.6Ranks 31 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 11.9 kn · median 14.4 (−17%)

10.9Faster than 18% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 177 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (+86%)

47.4Ranks 176 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports98%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

381 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PAULINE RUSS
Ro-ro median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PAULINE RUSS
Ro-ro median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

PAULINE RUSS
Ro-ro median

0.0200400600800

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	−14%	−8%	+14%	−7%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	+6%	+2%	−6%	+3%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−2.2 kn	−38%	−48%	−32%	+19%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 38%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	+12%	+4%	−30%	+60%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.1 kn	−11%	−4%	+86%	+39%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.6 kn	−10%	−19%	−27%	+15%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+5.9 kn	+15%	+87%	+2%	−90%	5.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MS "PAULINE RUSS" Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	3,207	10,196	49,343	4,152	11.9	65.0	177	–
2024	MS "PAULINE RUSS" Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	3,251	10,165	43,166	3,862	11.2	75.3	190	–
2023	not published	3,246	10,144	45,811	3,940	11.6	70.8	185	–
2022	not published	7,611	23,725	66,959	4,837	13.8	114	155	–
2021	not published	9,686	30,181	95,052	6,418	14.8	102	97.1	–
2020	not published	5,872	18,327	51,237	3,738	13.7	115	–	–
2019	not published	8,844	27,585	69,804	4,549	15.3	127	–	–
2018	not published	7,532	23,504	68,202	7,229	9.4	110	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS "PAULINE RUSS" Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	177	95.2	+86%	176 of 235	DNV	A
2024	MS "PAULINE RUSS" Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	190	97.5	+94%	172 of 220	DNV	A
2023	not published	185	109	+70%	163 of 221	DNV	A
2022	not published	155	90.6	+71%	166 of 223	DNV	A
2021	not published	97.1	104	−6%	100 of 219	DNV	A
2020	not published	69.9	8.53	+719%	62 of 69	DNV	A
2019	not published	60.8	9.58	+534%	59 of 67	DNV	A
2018	not published	618	11.6	+5,234%	65 of 65	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.