Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

DARMIK

IMO: 9201774
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 3,648 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EIV 24.30 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: GRANATO

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,334 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

50.4

Chemical tanker median 83.0 kg/nm (−39%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

48.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.7 (+189%)

Average speed

9.7 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (−13%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,025 t

CO₂ emitted

6,468 t

Distance sailed

40,210 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,158 h

173 days, 47% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,314 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 60.3 kg/nm · median 81.9 (−26%)

55.0Ranks 210 of 1,314, lowest first115

Average speedThis ship 6.7 kn · median 11.2 (−40%)

9.1Faster than 2% of chemical tanker ships12.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 52.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.2 (+221%)

9.07Ranks 1,240 of 1,314, lowest first43.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU31%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

1,239 t

61% of all fuel; 39% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

347 t

5.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DARMIK
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

DARMIK
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

DARMIK
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	−3.5 kn	+10%	−28%	−24%	−8%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+9%	+15%	+3%	+17%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+2.4 kn	−17%	+9%	+23%	−24%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+3%	+8%	−27%	+21%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+7%	−2%	−0%	+10%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023	not published	1,903	5,992	31,531	4,712	6.7	60.3	52.1	–
2022	not published	2,270	7,129	41,415	4,076	10.2	54.8	56.6	54%
2021	not published	2,025	6,468	40,210	4,158	9.7	50.4	48.2	61%
2020	not published	1,990	6,307	32,769	4,480	7.3	60.7	63.7	51%
2019	not published	2,638	8,439	44,865	6,405	7.0	58.8	52.8	–
2018	not published	2,469	7,917	45,089	5,867	7.7	54.8	48.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	52.1	16.2	+221%	1,240 of 1,314	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	56.6	16.1	+252%	1,365 of 1,409	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	48.2	16.7	+189%	1,262 of 1,343	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	63.7	16.2	+294%	1,286 of 1,312	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	52.8	17.3	+205%	1,248 of 1,321	RINA	B
2018	not published	48.2	17.1	+181%	1,187 of 1,294	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.