Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

ASIAN MAJESTY

IMO: 9203576
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 4,607 t
Flag (estimated): South Korea
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.90 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Eukor Car Carriers Inc.

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,484 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

128

Ro-ro median 108 kg/nm (+18%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

47.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 91.0 (−48%)

Average speed

15.6 kn

Ro-ro median 14.7 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

47.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,523 t

CO₂ emitted

17,275 t

Distance sailed

43,239 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,776 h

116 days, 32% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 131 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+31%)

79.6Ranks 489 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 12.5 kn · median 14.4 (−13%)

12.0Faster than 14% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 90.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+64%)

34.7Ranks 394 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU47%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

302 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ASIAN MAJESTY
Vehicle carrier median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ASIAN MAJESTY
Vehicle carrier median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ASIAN MAJESTY
Vehicle carrier median

0.050.0100150200250

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.9 kn	+15%	−7%	−88%	+37%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+2%	−3%	−19%	+30%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.5 kn	−2%	+16%	+163%	−79%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	−11%	−19%	−78%	+424%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.1 kn	+17%	+9%	−35%	−0%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.1 kn	−8%	−2%	−24%	+1%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	−6%	−10%	+40%	−2%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Eukor Car Carriers Inc.	226	725	1,732	139	12.5	131	90.9	–
2024	Eukor Car Carriers Inc.	1,574	4,944	13,883	902	15.4	113	66.4	–
2023	not published	1,903	6,013	17,083	1,056	16.2	111	51.1	–
2022	not published	740	2,343	6,487	475	13.7	114	242	–
2021	not published	3,793	11,991	29,713	1,983	15.0	128	46.2	–
2020	not published	5,012	15,835	45,776	2,848	16.1	110	46.4	–
2019	not published	7,214	22,568	60,319	4,027	15.0	120	46.0	–
2018	not published	5,523	17,275	43,239	2,776	15.6	128	47.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Eukor Car Carriers Inc.	90.9	55.4	+64%	394 of 506	DNV	A+C
2024	Eukor Car Carriers Inc.	66.4	55.3	+20%	212 of 335	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	51.1	56.6	−10%	164 of 417	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	242	57.7	+320%	449 of 463	DNV	C
2021	not published	46.2	59.6	−22%	92 of 459	DNV	C
2020	not published	46.4	57.3	−19%	106 of 449	DNV	C
2019	not published	46.0	59.0	−22%	60 of 426	DNV	C
2018	not published	47.1	91.0	−48%	27 of 260	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.