Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

TIMBERLAND

IMO: 9204790
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): United Kingdom
Port of registry: London
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.97 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MIDLIFE SHIPPING LIMITED

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

63.6

General cargo median 57.7 kg/nm (+10%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

15.1

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.0 (−39%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

General cargo median 9.7 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,768 t

CO₂ emitted

8,729 t

Distance sailed

43,528 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,958 h

165 days, 45% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 62.9 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+79%)

17.4Ranks 2,116 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 12.5 kn · median 9.3 (+34%)

6.9Faster than 93% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 11.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−55%)

10.2Ranks 338 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports24%
From the EU45%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

491 t

5.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TIMBERLAND
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TIMBERLAND
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

TIMBERLAND
General cargo median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	−7%	+1%	+0%	−28%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.3 kn	+20%	+0%	−15%	+28%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.4 kn	−8%	+23%	−13%	−5%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.1 kn	−7%	−23%	+36%	−13%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	−22%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	+0%	+15%	+17%	+20%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	+4%	+7%	−20%	+13%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	MIDLIFE SHIPPING LIMITED	2,388	7,594	37,644	3,038	12.4	63.4	–	–
2025	IMPERIAL RO-RO LIM	2,535	8,060	40,276	3,230	12.5	62.9	–	–
2024	MIDLIFE SHIPPING LIMITED	2,712	8,575	40,184	3,480	11.5	67.5	16.0	85%
2023	not published	2,659	8,452	47,168	3,412	13.8	56.4	–	88%
2022	not published	3,298	10,419	54,089	5,203	10.4	61.0	13.1	88%
2021	not published	2,609	8,234	39,816	3,174	12.5	65.5	–	–
2020	not published	3,238	10,206	50,886	4,036	12.6	63.6	–	–
2019	not published	2,768	8,729	43,528	3,958	11.0	63.6	–	–
2018	not published	3,357	10,586	54,685	5,129	10.7	61.4	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	MIDLIFE SHIPPING LIMITED	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2025	IMPERIAL RO-RO LIM	11.5	25.5	−55%	338 of 2,723	DNV	A
2024	MIDLIFE SHIPPING LIMITED	16.0	19.3	−17%	444 of 1,111	ABS	B
2023	not published	12.5	20.7	−40%	258 of 1,045	ABS	B
2022	not published	13.1	21.6	−39%	213 of 1,034	ABS	B
2021	not published	15.0	22.7	−34%	223 of 1,142	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	18.2	24.5	−26%	286 of 1,167	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	15.1	25.0	−39%	187 of 1,154	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	13.4	24.9	−46%	162 of 1,044	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.