Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

TANGO RIO

IMO: 9205718
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 4,635 t
Flag (estimated): Barbados
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEDI 19.06 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Tango Gemicilik Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

39.1

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (−29%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

19.1

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (−22%)

Average speed

9.7 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

9.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,100 t

CO₂ emitted

3,528 t

Distance sailed

28,149 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,907 h

121 days, 33% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,167 general cargo ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 39.1 kg/nm · median 55.1 (−29%)

36.0Ranks 184 of 1,167, lowest first90.9

Average speedThis ship 9.7 kn · median 10.7 (−9%)

8.2Faster than 31% of general cargo ships12.9

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 19.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 24.5 (−22%)

11.3Ranks 323 of 1,167, lowest first48.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports43%
From the EU15%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

65 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TANGO RIO
General cargo median

35.040.045.050.055.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TANGO RIO
General cargo median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

TANGO RIO
General cargo median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.4 kn	+20%	+5%	−84%	–	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+4%	+6%	+6%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+5%	+0%	+60%	–	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.9 kn	−8%	+11%	+3%	–	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+12%	+7%	−22%	–	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	−15%	−5%	−16%	−8%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−1%	−4%	−11%	+84%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Tango Gemicilik Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi	313	995	5,950	628	9.5	52.6	36.1	–
2024	Tango Gemicilik Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi	1,667	5,283	38,121	3,509	10.9	43.7	22.5	–
2023	not published	1,519	4,813	35,964	3,362	10.7	42.2	22.3	–
2022	not published	900	2,882	22,437	2,000	11.2	40.1	18.7	–
2021	not published	954	3,058	21,827	2,353	9.3	43.7	24.0	–
2020	not published	1,100	3,528	28,149	2,907	9.7	39.1	–	–
2019	not published	1,538	4,822	33,463	3,851	8.7	46.0	–	–
2018	not published	1,754	5,491	37,638	4,197	9.0	46.6	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Tango Gemicilik Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	–
2024	Tango Gemicilik Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	–
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	–
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2020	not published	19.1	24.5	−22%	323 of 1,167	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2019	not published	20.8	25.0	−17%	388 of 1,154	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2018	not published	11.3	24.9	−55%	125 of 1,044	Lloyd's Register	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.