Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

ZEUS PALACE

IMO
9208071
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Palermo
Technical efficiency
EIV 21.16 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A · part of Grimaldi Group

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
188.4 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (+25%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
755
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+33%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
117
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−54%)
Average speed
18.4 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+16%)
Fuel per day at sea
83.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
18,281 t
CO₂ emitted
57,088 t
57,986 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
97,021 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,287 h
220 days, 60% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 188.4 kg/nm · median 150.2 (+25%)
69.3Ranks 313 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 18.4 kn · median 15.8 (+16%)
12.0Faster than 72% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 754.64 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+33%)
66.76Ranks 250 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 117.22 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (−54%)
48.59Ranks 110 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports88%
  • From the EU2%
  • Into the EU2%
  • At berth in the EU8%

98% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (55,867 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
7.5%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.9 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • ZEUS PALACE
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • ZEUS PALACE
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • ZEUS PALACE
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • ZEUS PALACE
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+4.1 kn+4%+34%−2%+0%4.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−5.5 kn−8%−33%−11%−8%5.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+0.4 kn−7%−5%+2%−36%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−3.7 kn−11%−25%−12%−65%3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+1.7 kn+10%+19%+23%+80%1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+0.6 kn+14%+18%−2%+112%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+0.4 kn+2%+4%+21%−10%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A18,28157,08897,0215,28718.4188.4––
2024GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A17,94056,02199,1376,95314.3181.0––
2023not published21,86368,261111,7185,64219.8195.7––
2022not published23,24972,598109,9675,68019.4211.4––
2021not published29,69192,685125,2385,42723.1237.1––
2020not published21,98668,600102,1604,77521.4215.2––
2019not published19,67761,484104,5285,02420.8188.2––
2018not published16,06250,67986,6824,24520.4185.3––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A754.64566.51+33%250 of 408117.22253.18−54%RINAA
2024GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A752.45546.68+38%248 of 404112.12232.85−52%RINAA
2023not published813.82680.04+20%226 of 386103.14233.94−56%RINAA
2022not published1,274.64626.32+104%327 of 394105.27252.90−58%RINAA
2021not published3,691.37815.19+353%361 of 37781.25226.00−64%RINAA
2020not published2,053.82750.91+174%331 of 38788.38217.49−59%RINAA
2019not published968.31569.03+70%280 of 39475.58222.56−66%RINAA
2018not published1,081.38728.92+48%234 of 36187.06184.05−53%RINAA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.