Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

0056 E.R. PUSAN

IMO
9211169
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
40,976 t
Flag (estimated)
Liberia
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EIV 19.56 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
E.R. PUSAN
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 40,219 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
233
Container median 182 kg/nm (+28%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
18.1
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−11%)
Average speed
12.1 kn
Container median 13.8 kn (−12%)
Fuel per day at sea
67.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
18,489 t
CO₂ emitted
57,609 t
Distance sailed
79,356 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
6,560 h
273 days, 75% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,788 container ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 212 kg/nm · median 174 (+21%)
82.1Ranks 1,067 of 1,788, lowest first309
Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 13.7 (−1%)
8.6Faster than 47% of container ships16.5
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 18.9 (−15%)
7.86Ranks 730 of 1,788, lowest first55.3
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports70%
  • From the EU6%
  • Into the EU18%
  • At berth in the EU6%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
3,439 t
6.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • 0056 E.R. PUSAN
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • 0056 E.R. PUSAN
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • 0056 E.R. PUSAN
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2018→2019+1.5 kn−9%+2%+6%−11%1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2019not published17,78855,42184,0616,18913.621216.1–
2018not published18,48957,60979,3566,56012.123318.1–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2019not published16.118.9−15%730 of 1,788VerifaviaB
2018not published18.120.2−11%733 of 1,705VerifaviaB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.