Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

TRANSOSPREY

IMO: 9213090
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.74 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Osprey Marine LIMITED

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

85.2

General cargo median 58.4 kg/nm (+46%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

18.2

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.9 (−27%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

General cargo median 9.7 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,179 t

CO₂ emitted

13,183 t

Distance sailed

49,066 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,472 h

186 days, 51% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 80.1 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+128%)

17.4Ranks 2,472 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 9.3 (+22%)

6.9Faster than 83% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 15.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−38%)

10.2Ranks 501 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports30%
From the EU43%
Into the EU23%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

515 t

3.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TRANSOSPREY
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TRANSOSPREY
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

TRANSOSPREY
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+1%	−1%	−1%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+0%	+0%	+30%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−4%	−6%	−15%	−33%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−3%	−5%	+13%	+61%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	+2%	+10%	−17%	−15%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−4%	−2%	+8%	+16%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	+2%	+0%	+1%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Osprey Marine LIMITED	74	230	1,057	86	12.3	69.7	–	–
2025	TransOsprey Marine Limited	4,467	14,130	55,776	4,947	11.3	80.1	–	–
2024	Osprey Marine LIMITED	4,466	14,110	56,284	4,875	11.5	79.3	–	–
2023	not published	3,446	10,892	43,462	3,776	11.5	79.3	–	–
2022	not published	4,222	13,320	50,949	4,375	11.6	82.9	–	–
2021	not published	3,831	12,090	45,025	3,783	11.9	85.1	–	–
2020	not published	4,517	14,252	54,025	4,903	11.0	83.6	–	–
2019	not published	4,324	13,652	49,799	4,621	10.8	86.8	–	–
2018	not published	4,179	13,183	49,066	4,472	11.0	85.2	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Osprey Marine LIMITED	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2025	TransOsprey Marine Limited	15.7	25.5	−38%	501 of 2,723	DNV	A
2024	Osprey Marine LIMITED	15.5	19.3	−19%	424 of 1,111	DNV	A
2023	not published	19.6	20.7	−5%	474 of 1,045	DNV	A
2022	not published	29.3	21.6	+36%	754 of 1,034	DNV	A
2021	not published	18.2	22.7	−20%	352 of 1,142	DNV	A
2020	not published	21.3	24.5	−13%	429 of 1,167	DNV	A
2019	not published	18.4	25.0	−26%	287 of 1,154	DNV	A
2018	not published	18.2	24.9	−27%	271 of 1,044	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.