Navalyze · Container · Ship

SENTOSA

IMO: 9216365
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 8,567 t
Flag (estimated): United Kingdom
Port of registry: London
Technical efficiency: EIV 32.00 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,567 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

116

Container median 174 kg/nm (−34%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

42.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+124%)

Average speed

3.8 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−72%)

Fuel per day at sea

10.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,307 t

CO₂ emitted

10,338 t

Distance sailed

28,582 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

7,481 h

312 days, 85% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,788 container ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 116 kg/nm · median 174 (−34%)

82.1Ranks 535 of 1,788, lowest first309

Average speedThis ship 3.8 kn · median 13.7 (−72%)

8.6Faster than 1% of container ships16.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 18.9 (+124%)

7.86Ranks 1,457 of 1,788, lowest first55.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports79%
From the EU11%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

992 t

9.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SENTOSA
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

SENTOSA
Container median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SENTOSA
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2018→2019	−5.3 kn	+20%	−50%	−48%	+23%	5.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2019	not published	3,307	10,338	28,582	7,481	3.8	116	42.2	–
2018	not published	5,302	16,594	55,018	6,063	9.1	96.4	34.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	42.2	18.9	+124%	1,457 of 1,788	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	34.3	20.2	+69%	1,243 of 1,705	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.