Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

CIUDAD DE GRANADA

IMO: 9217125
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Spain
Port of registry: Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency: EIV 25.13 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SOROLLA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

195

Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (+27%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

571

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (−16%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

573

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (+145%)

Average speed

16.7 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

78.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,411 t

CO₂ emitted

35,689 t

Distance sailed

58,559 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,499 h

146 days, 40% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 203 kg/nm · median 150 (+35%)

69.3Ranks 335 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 16.7 kn · median 15.8 (+6%)

12.0Faster than 59% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 293 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−48%)

66.8Ranks 145 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 417 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+65%)

48.6Ranks 253 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports87%
From the EU2%
Into the EU2%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,423 t

9.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CIUDAD DE GRANADA
Ro-pax median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CIUDAD DE GRANADA
Ro-pax median

14.015.016.017.018.019.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

CIUDAD DE GRANADA
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

CIUDAD DE GRANADA
Ro-pax median

0.05,00010,00015,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	+2%	+2%	+1%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	+32%	−48%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−16%	−16%	−25%	+94%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	+3%	−4%	+5%	−19%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+4%	+4%	+19%	−98%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.0 kn	+13%	+35%	−7%	+104%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−3%	−1%	−9%	+317,162%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL	15,748	49,290	77,458	4,643	16.7	203	–	–
2024	TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL	15,406	48,171	77,009	4,639	16.6	200	–	–
2023	not published	11,411	35,689	58,559	3,499	16.7	195	–	–
2022	not published	18,143	56,601	78,251	4,677	16.7	232	–	–
2021	not published	16,882	52,693	74,870	4,175	17.9	226	–	–
2020	not published	13,592	42,389	62,957	3,487	18.1	216	–	–
2019	not published	12,968	40,471	67,857	4,487	15.1	191	–	–
2018	not published	14,655	45,746	74,560	5,029	14.8	197	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL	293	567	−48%	145 of 408	417	253	+65%	RINA	A
2024	TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL	298	547	−45%	144 of 404	483	233	+107%	RINA	A
2023	not published	571	680	−16%	170 of 386	573	234	+145%	RINA	A
2022	not published	295	626	−53%	122 of 394	721	253	+185%	RINA	A
2021	not published	362	815	−56%	127 of 377	455	226	+101%	RINA	B
2020	not published	14,656	751	+1,852%	384 of 387	458	217	+111%	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2019	not published	7,202	569	+1,166%	387 of 394	1,359	223	+510%	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	2.27	729	−100%	17 of 361	7.03	184	−96%	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.