Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

UMS-ALBEDO

IMO: 9217163
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MARMUNA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Unimar Shipping Management

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

53.4 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+51%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

30.32

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (+19%)

Average speed

5.6 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (−40%)

Fuel per day at sea

7.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

714 t

CO₂ emitted

2,269 t

2,304 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

13,381 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,390 h

100 days, 27% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 53.4 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+51%)

17.4Ranks 1,921 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 5.6 kn · median 9.3 (−40%)

7.0Faster than 4% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 30.32 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (+19%)

10.14Ranks 1,772 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU47%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU3%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,299 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

UMS-ALBEDO
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

UMS-ALBEDO
General cargo median

2.04.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

UMS-ALBEDO
General cargo median

0.050.0100150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−4.5 kn	+24%	−31%	+1%	+22%	4.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−2%	−5%	+166%	+2%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+7.3 kn	+36%	+354%	−6%	+4%	7.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 36%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−4.9 kn	−43%	−78%	−70%	−4%	4.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 43%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.3 kn	−9%	−22%	+164%	+14%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.1 kn	+16%	+31%	−48%	−82%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	+15%	+9%	−57%	+170%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Unimar Shipping Management	714	2,269	13,381	2,390	5.6	53.4	–	–
2024	Unimar Shipping Management	569	1,777	13,241	1,311	10.1	43.0	24.78	–
2023	not published	218	683	4,984	481	10.4	43.8	28.20	–
2022	not published	170	537	5,277	1,719	3.1	32.2	24.49	–
2021	not published	988	3,119	17,435	2,172	8.0	56.7	25.88	–
2020	not published	411	1,298	6,592	710	9.3	62.4	31.03	–
2019	not published	688	2,143	12,756	1,551	8.2	53.9	–	–
2018	not published	1,393	4,359	29,709	3,444	8.6	46.9	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Unimar Shipping Management	30.32	25.45	+19%	1,772 of 2,706	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	Unimar Shipping Management	24.78	19.25	+29%	775 of 1,111	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	24.32	20.67	+18%	674 of 1,045	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2022	not published	23.47	21.57	+9%	585 of 1,034	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	24.43	22.70	+8%	668 of 1,142	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	21.48	24.50	−12%	433 of 1,167	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	119.91	24.96	+380%	1,126 of 1,154	DNV	A
2018	not published	44.45	24.89	+79%	869 of 1,044	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.