Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL HOLLAND

IMO
9218674
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
51,058 t
Flag (estimated)
Singapore
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EIV 21.01 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 42,770 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
247
Container median 182 kg/nm (+36%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
18.0
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−11%)
Average speed
16.7 kn
Container median 13.8 kn (+21%)
Fuel per day at sea
98.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
21,750 t
CO₂ emitted
67,918 t
Distance sailed
88,075 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,282 h
220 days, 60% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,788 container ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 226 kg/nm · median 174 (+29%)
82.1Ranks 1,119 of 1,788, lowest first309
Average speedThis ship 15.5 kn · median 13.7 (+13%)
8.6Faster than 76% of container ships16.5
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 18.9 (−27%)
7.86Ranks 560 of 1,788, lowest first55.3
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports5%
  • From the EU46%
  • Into the EU47%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,399 t
2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • APL HOLLAND
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • APL HOLLAND
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • APL HOLLAND
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2018→2019−1.2 kn−9%−15%−8%−23%1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2019not published18,35757,36481,2965,24515.522613.898%
2018not published21,75067,91888,0755,28216.724718.0–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2019not published13.818.9−27%560 of 1,788ABSC
2018not published18.020.2−11%731 of 1,705ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.