Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

MOBY TOMMY

IMO
9221310
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Napoli
Technical efficiency
EEXI 22.77 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOBY SPA

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
190.5 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (+27%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
913
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+61%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
59.87
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−76%)
Average speed
16.6 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+5%)
Fuel per day at sea
75.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
11,101 t
CO₂ emitted
35,140 t
35,685 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
58,262 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,509 h
146 days, 40% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 190.5 kg/nm · median 150.2 (+27%)
69.3Ranks 315 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 16.6 kn · median 15.8 (+5%)
12.0Faster than 59% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 913.36 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+61%)
66.76Ranks 278 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 59.87 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (−76%)
48.59Ranks 47 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports81%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU19%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (35,140 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
19.2%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.6 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • MOBY TOMMY
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • MOBY TOMMY
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MOBY TOMMY
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • MOBY TOMMY
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−1.9 kn−19%−27%+83%−10%1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024+2.7 kn−6%+10%+9%+5%2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−0.2 kn−3%−4%+45%+186%Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022−0.7 kn+5%+1%−64%−45%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−1.0 kn+4%−1%−25%+21%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020−0.5 kn+1%−2%+1%−8%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+0.9 kn+3%+8%+18%−46%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025MOBY SPA11,10135,14058,2623,50916.6190.5––
2024MOBY SPA7,51423,59131,8851,72618.5235.7––
2023not published7,28522,84229,1501,84515.8249.9––
2022not published5,15616,09320,1001,25816.0256.5––
2021not published13,54842,40555,5433,32216.7243.9––
2020not published17,27653,91673,9154,17617.7233.7––
2019not published16,98253,00473,4634,03118.2231.2––
2018not published13,95343,59162,1983,58917.3224.3––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025MOBY SPA913.36566.51+61%278 of 40859.87253.18−76%RINAA
2024MOBY SPA1,013.10546.68+85%295 of 40476.60232.85−67%RINAA
2023not published963.31680.04+42%259 of 38665.62233.94−72%RINAA
2022not published337.07626.32−46%134 of 39424.84252.90−90%RINAA
2021not published617.35815.19−24%166 of 37753.77226.00−76%RINAA
2020not published511.72750.91−32%153 of 38752.06217.49−76%RINAA
2019not published555.48569.03−2%190 of 39441.89222.56−81%RINAA
2018not published1,024.16728.92+41%229 of 361100.35184.05−45%RINAA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.