Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ANDRIANA III

IMO: 9222120
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 16,607 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.03 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SPIRIT OF TOKYO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,424 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

111

Container median 172 kg/nm (−36%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

26.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+48%)

Average speed

12.0 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,770 t

CO₂ emitted

15,060 t

Distance sailed

43,100 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,595 h

150 days, 41% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 91.7 kg/nm · median 177 (−48%)

78.8Ranks 431 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.1 kn · median 13.3 (−32%)

9.1Faster than 11% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+6%)

7.22Ranks 1,175 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports44%
From the EU9%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,295 t

8.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC ANDRIANA III
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ANDRIANA III
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ANDRIANA III
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.1 kn	−11%	+2%	−2%	−1%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	+2%	−9%	−35%	−12%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−18%	−24%	+92%	−32%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	−2%	−10%	−65%	+24%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.5 kn	+13%	−1%	+2%	−9%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.8 kn	+17%	+71%	+106%	−14%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	1,741	5,435	18,993	2,079	9.1	91.7	17.2	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	1,998	6,256	19,427	2,434	8.0	103	17.5	–
2023	not published	2,998	9,476	29,705	3,331	8.9	101	19.9	–
2022	not published	1,901	6,003	15,480	1,610	9.6	123	29.2	–
2021	not published	5,490	17,329	43,980	4,172	10.5	125	23.6	–
2020	not published	4,770	15,060	43,100	3,595	12.0	111	26.0	–
2019	not published	1,989	6,234	20,966	2,569	8.2	94.9	30.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	17.2	16.3	+6%	1,175 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	17.5	17.5	−0%	983 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	19.9	19.4	+2%	978 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	29.2	19.1	+52%	1,281 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	23.6	17.9	+32%	1,140 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	26.0	17.6	+48%	1,251 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	30.3	18.9	+60%	1,271 of 1,788	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.