Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

LOVE

IMO
9222132
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
15,600 t
Flag (estimated)
Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry
St.John'S
Technical efficiency
EIV 4.64 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
AMAZON GLADIATOR, GLADIATOR

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: SPARROW SHIPPING LIMITED

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 19,113 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
256
Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+98%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
42.9
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.44 (+408%)
Average speed
2.8 kn
Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (−75%)
Fuel per day at sea
17.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
146 t
CO₂ emitted
469 t
Distance sailed
573 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
206 h
9 days, 2% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,787 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 276 kg/nm · median 129 (+114%)
79.5Ranks 1,767 of 1,787, lowest first194
Average speedThis ship 2.6 kn · median 10.9 (−76%)
8.1Faster than 0% of oil tanker ships12.3
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 56.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.06 (+604%)
4.44Ranks 1,749 of 1,787, lowest first25.7
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU32%
  • Into the EU34%
  • At berth in the EU34%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
159 t
33.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • LOVE
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • LOVE
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • LOVE
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2023→2024−0.2 kn+8%+1%−50%+32%Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+2.3 kn−74%+46%+2,022%–2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 74%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−8.9 kn+563%−65%−100%–8.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 563%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+3.4 kn−45%−13%+64%–3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 45%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2020−6.9 kn+103%−6%−40%–6.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 103%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2024part-yearSPARROW SHIPPING LIMITED792552871112.627656.8–
2024NauticalNebula Holdings Ltd.792552871112.627656.8–
2023not published1464695732062.825642.9–
2022not published268327530.5969309–
2021not published1,2743,9898,7219259.414625.2–
2020not published1,4084,4595,3168896.026573,501–
2018not published1,1583,6198,85468812.913113.6–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2024part-yearSPARROW SHIPPING LIMITED––––DNVB
2024NauticalNebula Holdings Ltd.56.88.06+604%1,749 of 1,787EMICERTA
2023not published42.98.44+408%1,729 of 1,797DNVB
2022not published––––DNVB
2021not published25.28.86+185%1,612 of 1,789DNVB
2020not published––––DNVB
2018not published13.68.86+53%1,320 of 1,779ABSA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.