Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

MJ MASSA

IMO: 9224867
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 15,518 t
Flag (estimated): Barbados
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.57 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: APOLLONIA, MASSA J

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Logan Ship Management Co

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,982 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

81.0

Bulk carrier median 86.5 kg/nm (−6%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.24 (+208%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

278 t

CO₂ emitted

867 t

Distance sailed

3,430 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

308 h

13 days, 4% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 71.6 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−13%)

61.0Ranks 982 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 10.7 (+2%)

8.8Faster than 60% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+84%)

4.80Ranks 3,167 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU58%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

23 t

2.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MJ MASSA
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MJ MASSA
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MJ MASSA
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.4 kn	−4%	+24%	−37%	−21%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.4 kn	−11%	−31%	+300%	+92%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	+34%	+34%	+56%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 34%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	−0.3 kn	−23%	−25%	−24%	−54%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	+1%	+11%	−78%	+150%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−5%	−2%	−49%	−27%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Logan Ship Management Co	738	2,330	10,307	946	10.9	71.6	14.6	–
2024	Logan Ship Management Co	1,213	3,790	16,270	1,924	8.5	74.6	18.5	–
2023	not published	342	1,067	4,070	374	10.9	83.9	9.63	–
2022	not published	163	515	2,609	241	10.8	62.5	11.7	–
2020	not published	278	867	3,430	308	11.1	81.0	25.3	–
2019	not published	1,269	3,966	15,825	1,550	10.2	80.2	10.1	–
2018	not published	2,610	8,132	30,985	3,145	9.9	84.2	13.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Logan Ship Management Co	14.6	7.90	+84%	3,167 of 3,611	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	Logan Ship Management Co	18.5	8.09	+128%	2,882 of 3,089	Verum et Accuratus	A
2023	not published	9.63	8.27	+16%	2,242 of 3,548	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	11.7	8.71	+35%	2,948 of 3,968	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	25.3	8.24	+208%	3,093 of 3,150	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	10.1	8.38	+21%	2,285 of 3,360	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	13.9	8.50	+64%	2,910 of 3,384	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.