Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

EIRA

IMO: 9225299
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Finland
Port of registry: Helsinki
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.69 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ESL Shipping Oy

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

73.0

General cargo median 55.9 kg/nm (+31%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

20.9

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 22.7 (−8%)

Average speed

9.1 kn

General cargo median 10.9 kn (−17%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,256 t

CO₂ emitted

7,110 t

Distance sailed

30,905 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,411 h

142 days, 39% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 70.9 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+101%)

17.4Ranks 2,295 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.3 kn · median 9.3 (+0%)

6.9Faster than 49% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 17.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−31%)

10.2Ranks 613 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports44%
From the EU19%
Into the EU16%
At berth in the EU21%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,485 t

20.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EIRA
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EIRA
General cargo median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

EIRA
General cargo median

16.018.020.022.024.026.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+6%	+3%	−30%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.4 kn	−12%	+3%	+31%	−18%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.4 kn	+1%	−21%	−17%	+7%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.5 kn	+3%	+20%	+23%	+1%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.6 kn	+6%	−18%	+38%	−10%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	−17%	+2%	−11%	−3%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	+21%	+10%	−33%	–	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ESL Shipping Oy	2,035	6,482	28,709	3,087	9.3	70.9	–	–
2024	ESL Shipping Oy	2,751	8,671	41,263	4,293	9.6	66.7	–	–
2023	not published	2,387	7,520	31,411	3,814	8.2	76.0	–	–
2022	not published	2,842	8,955	37,954	3,569	10.6	74.9	–	–
2021	not published	2,256	7,110	30,905	3,411	9.1	73.0	–	–
2020	not published	1,540	4,854	22,378	1,910	11.7	68.8	–	–
2019	not published	2,067	6,514	25,078	2,599	9.6	82.4	–	–
2018	not published	2,544	8,017	37,436	3,521	10.6	68.0	29.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ESL Shipping Oy	17.6	25.5	−31%	613 of 2,723	DNV	C
2024	ESL Shipping Oy	18.5	19.3	−4%	522 of 1,111	DNV	C
2023	not published	22.7	20.7	+10%	612 of 1,045	DNV	C
2022	not published	21.1	21.6	−2%	498 of 1,034	DNV	C
2021	not published	20.9	22.7	−8%	486 of 1,142	DNV	C
2020	not published	23.3	24.5	−5%	525 of 1,167	Lloyd's Register	C
2019	not published	24.0	25.0	−4%	525 of 1,154	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.