Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

V ARCTIC TERN

IMO: 9226750
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 47,023 t
Flag (estimated): Philippines
Port of registry: Manila
Technical efficiency: EIV 5.83 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 47,023 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

133

Bulk carrier median 91.2 kg/nm (+46%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.82

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.38 (+5%)

Average speed

5.4 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.3 kn (−48%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,181 t

CO₂ emitted

3,687 t

Distance sailed

8,891 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,642 h

68 days, 19% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2019

Set against all 3,360 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 133 kg/nm · median 91.2 (+46%)

67.0Ranks 3,004 of 3,360, lowest first135

Average speedThis ship 5.4 kn · median 10.3 (−48%)

7.4Faster than 2% of bulk carrier ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.82 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.38 (+5%)

4.89Ranks 1,855 of 3,360, lowest first15.5

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU29%
Into the EU63%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

205 t

5.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

V ARCTIC TERN
Bulk carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

V ARCTIC TERN
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

V ARCTIC TERN
Bulk carrier median

8.08.59.09.510.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2018→2019	−4.9 kn	+22%	−36%	+39%	−10%	4.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2019	not published	1,181	3,687	8,891	1,642	5.4	133	8.82	–
2018	not published	698	2,178	6,410	624	10.3	109	9.76	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	8.82	8.38	+5%	1,855 of 3,360	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	9.76	8.50	+15%	2,135 of 3,384	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.