Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ANISHA R.

IMO: 9227297
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 29,306 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.27 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 29,844 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

238

Container median 172 kg/nm (+38%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+43%)

Average speed

16.5 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+18%)

Fuel per day at sea

94.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,903 t

CO₂ emitted

50,110 t

Distance sailed

66,814 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,038 h

168 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 220 kg/nm · median 177 (+24%)

78.8Ranks 1,404 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 13.3 (+11%)

9.1Faster than 72% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 23.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+44%)

7.22Ranks 1,501 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU33%
Into the EU57%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,313 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC ANISHA R.
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ANISHA R.
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ANISHA R.
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.8 kn	−1%	−6%	−11%	−10%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	+16%	+22%	−17%	−12%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−13%	−16%	+18%	+3%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.5 kn	−14%	−22%	−14%	+15%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+8%	+9%	+0%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	+3%	−1%	−2%	−12%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	−4%	+4%	−5%	−4%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	11,150	34,870	50,718	3,458	14.7	220	23.5	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12,629	39,381	56,868	3,679	15.5	222	26.0	–
2023	not published	13,043	40,721	68,143	4,634	14.7	191	29.6	–
2022	not published	12,748	40,114	57,978	3,821	15.2	220	28.6	–
2021	not published	17,167	54,095	67,072	4,010	16.7	256	24.8	–
2020	not published	15,903	50,110	66,814	4,038	16.5	238	25.1	–
2019	not published	15,741	49,167	68,186	3,965	17.2	231	28.4	–
2018	not published	17,275	53,979	71,822	4,541	15.8	241	29.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	23.5	16.3	+44%	1,501 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	26.0	17.5	+49%	1,360 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	29.6	19.4	+52%	1,341 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	28.6	19.1	+50%	1,261 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	24.8	17.9	+39%	1,175 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	25.1	17.6	+43%	1,229 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	28.4	18.9	+51%	1,216 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	29.7	20.2	+47%	1,161 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.