Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC KATYA R.

IMO: 9227302
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 25,625 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.23 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 25,625 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

203.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

24.95

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+53%)

Average speed

15.0 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

73.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,570 t

CO₂ emitted

39,451 t

40,068 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

61,706 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,105 h

171 days, 47% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 203.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+15%)

78.8Ranks 1,298 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 15.0 kn · median 13.3 (+13%)

9.1Faster than 77% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.95 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+53%)

7.22Ranks 1,554 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU40%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU4%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (22,081 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.6 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC KATYA R.
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC KATYA R.
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC KATYA R.
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−9%	−9%	+73%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+27%	+25%	−16%	−5%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	−22%	−27%	−36%	−4%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	−10%	−17%	+5%	+14%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+6%	+9%	−6%	−11%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	−3%	−3%	−1%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	−7%	−2%	+75%	−5%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12,570	39,451	61,706	4,105	15.0	203.7	24.95	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	8,003	25,114	35,733	2,381	15.0	224.0	23.95	–
2023	not published	7,500	23,518	42,591	2,792	15.3	176.1	25.21	–
2022	not published	14,997	47,281	66,292	4,100	16.2	226.2	26.25	–
2021	not published	15,853	49,954	63,006	3,607	17.5	251.6	23.00	–
2020	not published	15,962	50,296	67,098	3,972	16.9	237.9	25.95	–
2019	not published	16,655	52,009	68,118	4,016	17.0	244.5	26.38	–
2018	not published	10,287	32,134	38,961	2,420	16.1	264.0	27.82	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	24.95	16.30	+53%	1,554 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	23.95	17.52	+37%	1,287 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	25.21	19.40	+30%	1,193 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	26.25	19.13	+37%	1,186 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	23.00	17.90	+28%	1,117 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	25.95	17.58	+48%	1,251 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	26.38	18.88	+40%	1,159 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	27.82	20.22	+38%	1,122 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.