Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ZLATA R.

IMO: 9227314
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 27,608 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.31 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 25,326 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

251

Container median 182 kg/nm (+38%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

31.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+53%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+15%)

Fuel per day at sea

95.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,155 t

CO₂ emitted

56,728 t

Distance sailed

72,350 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,555 h

190 days, 52% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 214 kg/nm · median 177 (+21%)

78.8Ranks 1,365 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 13.3 (+6%)

9.1Faster than 62% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+49%)

7.22Ranks 1,528 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU35%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,203 t

2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC ZLATA R.
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ZLATA R.
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ZLATA R.
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	−1%	−9%	−19%	−7%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	+12%	+19%	−3%	+2%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	−12%	−18%	+3%	−6%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	−8%	−17%	−25%	+16%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+1%	+1%	+8%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−5%	−7%	−5%	−14%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.6 kn	−2%	+8%	−7%	−10%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	9,095	28,463	42,567	3,015	14.1	214	24.2	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	11,295	35,353	52,531	3,405	15.4	215	26.1	–
2023	not published	10,351	32,344	53,996	3,706	14.6	192	25.6	–
2022	not published	11,417	35,978	52,240	3,368	15.5	219	27.3	–
2021	not published	16,462	51,873	69,488	4,051	17.2	237	23.5	–
2020	not published	15,088	47,541	64,223	3,751	17.1	235	24.1	–
2019	not published	16,577	51,778	67,303	3,846	17.5	246	27.9	–
2018	not published	18,155	56,728	72,350	4,555	15.9	251	31.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	24.2	16.3	+49%	1,528 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	26.1	17.5	+49%	1,362 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	25.6	19.4	+32%	1,210 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	27.3	19.1	+43%	1,223 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	23.5	17.9	+31%	1,136 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	24.1	17.6	+37%	1,195 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	27.9	18.9	+48%	1,205 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	31.0	20.2	+53%	1,190 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.