Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC VIDISHA R.

IMO: 9227326
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 26,986 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.30 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 27,729 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

245

Container median 174 kg/nm (+41%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

27.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+46%)

Average speed

17.0 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+24%)

Fuel per day at sea

100.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,390 t

CO₂ emitted

48,061 t

Distance sailed

62,731 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,682 h

153 days, 42% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 212 kg/nm · median 177 (+20%)

78.8Ranks 1,356 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.0 kn · median 13.3 (+13%)

9.1Faster than 77% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+51%)

7.22Ranks 1,548 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU35%
Into the EU59%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

908 t

1.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC VIDISHA R.
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC VIDISHA R.
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC VIDISHA R.
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	+12%	+19%	−5%	+21%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−1%	−3%	+6%	−25%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−16%	−16%	+292%	+33%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	+1%	−9%	−73%	+0%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	−2%	−7%	+33%	−22%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−7%	−7%	−42%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	+1%	+10%	+43%	+7%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	11,110	34,714	52,334	3,486	15.0	212	24.6	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	10,415	32,595	55,047	3,885	14.2	189	20.4	–
2023	not published	9,916	31,043	51,836	3,588	14.4	191	27.2	–
2022	not published	3,007	9,480	13,239	917	14.4	227	20.5	–
2021	not published	10,846	34,216	48,363	3,012	16.1	224	20.4	–
2020	not published	8,308	26,178	36,451	2,142	17.0	228	26.3	–
2019	not published	15,390	48,061	62,731	3,682	17.0	245	27.6	–
2018	not published	10,716	33,475	43,954	2,815	15.6	244	25.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	24.6	16.3	+51%	1,548 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	20.4	17.5	+16%	1,147 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	27.2	19.4	+40%	1,269 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	20.5	19.1	+7%	964 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	20.4	17.9	+14%	1,015 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	26.3	17.6	+50%	1,260 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	27.6	18.9	+46%	1,198 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	25.8	20.2	+28%	1,062 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.