Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC JULIA R.

IMO: 9227338
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 29,145 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.84 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 29,326 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

232

Container median 172 kg/nm (+35%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+42%)

Average speed

16.9 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+21%)

Fuel per day at sea

94.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,113 t

CO₂ emitted

50,773 t

Distance sailed

69,364 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,105 h

171 days, 47% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 224 kg/nm · median 177 (+26%)

78.8Ranks 1,433 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.5 kn · median 13.3 (+9%)

9.1Faster than 69% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+47%)

7.22Ranks 1,519 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU32%
Into the EU62%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

883 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC JULIA R.
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC JULIA R.
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC JULIA R.
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	+1%	−3%	−4%	−11%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	+4%	+13%	+45%	−13%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.1 kn	−2%	−15%	−42%	+11%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−12%	−14%	+187%	+17%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+6%	+3%	−66%	−5%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−2%	−4%	+22%	−12%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	+1.5 kn	+0%	+10%	−23%	−5%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	12,162	37,970	54,351	3,756	14.5	224	24.0	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12,551	39,321	56,577	3,754	15.1	222	26.9	–
2023	not published	8,337	26,272	39,088	2,818	13.9	213	30.8	–
2022	not published	14,507	45,721	66,992	4,190	16.0	217	27.8	–
2021	not published	5,726	18,044	23,346	1,416	16.5	245	23.8	–
2020	not published	16,113	50,773	69,364	4,105	16.9	232	25.0	–
2019	not published	13,386	41,808	56,668	3,258	17.4	236	28.2	–
2018	not published	17,378	54,290	73,876	4,640	15.9	235	29.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	24.0	16.3	+47%	1,519 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	26.9	17.5	+53%	1,376 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	30.8	19.4	+59%	1,362 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	27.8	19.1	+45%	1,237 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	23.8	17.9	+33%	1,149 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	25.0	17.6	+42%	1,224 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	28.2	18.9	+49%	1,212 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	29.8	20.2	+47%	1,166 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.