Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC VAISHNAVI R.

IMO: 9227340
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 29,570 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.39 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 20,027 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

220

Container median 165 kg/nm (+33%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

34.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (+79%)

Average speed

13.4 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

70.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,362 t

CO₂ emitted

39,096 t

Distance sailed

56,211 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,203 h

175 days, 48% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 213 kg/nm · median 177 (+20%)

78.8Ranks 1,360 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.5 kn · median 13.3 (+9%)

9.1Faster than 68% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 22.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+38%)

7.22Ranks 1,459 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU36%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,400 t

3.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC VAISHNAVI R.
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC VAISHNAVI R.
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC VAISHNAVI R.
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−3%	−2%	+116%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	−0%	+7%	−51%	−30%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−5%	−15%	−8%	+15%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	−7%	−15%	−3%	+29%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.1 kn	−0%	−6%	−7%	−11%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+3%	+3%	+7%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	−5%	+1%	+45%	−2%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	12,621	39,565	59,282	4,099	14.5	213	22.6	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	6,015	18,815	27,466	1,913	14.4	219	24.2	–
2023	not published	12,362	39,096	56,211	4,203	13.4	220	34.7	–
2022	not published	14,091	44,447	61,114	4,075	15.0	231	30.2	–
2021	not published	15,679	49,405	63,272	3,849	16.4	248	23.4	–
2020	not published	16,836	53,050	67,821	3,875	17.5	248	26.3	–
2019	not published	15,276	47,686	63,638	3,622	17.6	240	26.4	–
2018	not published	11,158	34,853	44,017	2,674	16.5	254	27.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	22.6	16.3	+38%	1,459 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	24.2	17.5	+38%	1,301 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	34.7	19.4	+79%	1,447 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	30.2	19.1	+58%	1,305 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	23.4	17.9	+30%	1,131 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	26.3	17.6	+49%	1,256 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	26.4	18.9	+40%	1,159 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	27.0	20.2	+33%	1,101 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.