Navalyze · Container · Ship

COSCO HONG KONG

IMO: 9227778
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 39,766 t
Flag (estimated): United Kingdom
Port of registry: London
Technical efficiency: EIV 16.73 g CO₂/t·nm

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 39,766 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

182

Container median 182 kg/nm (+0%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−29%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

60.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,404 t

CO₂ emitted

7,501 t

Distance sailed

13,227 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

956 h

40 days, 11% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2018

Set against all 1,705 container ships with a full-year 2018 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 182 kg/nm · median 182 (+0%)

82.0Ranks 854 of 1,705, lowest first313

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 13.8 (+0%)

8.7Faster than 51% of container ships16.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 20.2 (−29%)

8.65Ranks 503 of 1,705, lowest first54.4

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports40%
From the EU29%
Into the EU24%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

498 t

6.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2018	not published	2,404	7,501	13,227	956	13.8	182	14.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2018	not published	14.3	20.2	−29%	503 of 1,705	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.