Navalyze

Navalyze · Passenger · Ship

SAPPHIRE PRINCESS

IMO
9228186
Type
Passenger ship
Flag (estimated)
United Kingdom
Port of registry
London
Technical efficiency
EIV 26.61 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
468
Passenger median 277 kg/nm (+69%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
535
g CO₂/pax·nm · Passenger median 589 (−9%)
Average speed
15.8 kn
Passenger median 12.9 kn (+22%)
Fuel per day at sea
177.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
30,208 t
CO₂ emitted
95,288 t
Distance sailed
64,515 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,095 h
171 days, 47% of the year

Within the passenger fleet, 2019

Set against all 177 passenger ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 468 kg/nm · median 277 (+69%)
94.8Ranks 171 of 177, lowest first440
Average speedThis ship 15.8 kn · median 12.9 (+22%)
8.6Faster than 80% of passenger ships16.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 535 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 589 (−9%)
353Ranks 75 of 177, lowest first1,628
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Passenger medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports83%
  • From the EU4%
  • Into the EU6%
  • At berth in the EU7%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
6,937 t
7.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Passenger median is the middle ship of all passenger ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • SAPPHIRE PRINCESS
  • Passenger median

Average speed, kn

  • SAPPHIRE PRINCESS
  • Passenger median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • SAPPHIRE PRINCESS
  • Passenger median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2018→2019+0.9 kn+6%+12%+10%+5%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2019not published30,20895,28864,5154,09515.8468––
2018not published26,05782,32558,7453,95014.9444––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmPassenger medianvs PassengerRankVerifierMethods
2019not published535589−9%75 of 177DNVA
2018not published508577−12%63 of 153DNVA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Passenger ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's passenger ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.