Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

SEAPEAK HISPANIA

IMO: 9230048
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Spain
Port of registry: Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.51 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG
Former names: HISPANIA SPIRIT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Seapeak Maritime (Glasgow) Ltd · part of Seapeak

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

357

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (+41%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

13.5

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (+30%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (−12%)

Fuel per day at sea

106.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,117 t

CO₂ emitted

43,396 t

Distance sailed

42,369 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,412 h

142 days, 39% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2022

Set against all 379 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 357 kg/nm · median 252 (+41%)

174Ranks 321 of 379, lowest first380

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 14.1 (−12%)

10.2Faster than 28% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 13.5 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.4 (+30%)

5.96Ranks 270 of 379, lowest first26.4

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU43%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,105 t

4.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SEAPEAK HISPANIA
LNG carrier median

0.010,00020,00030,00040,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

SEAPEAK HISPANIA
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

SEAPEAK HISPANIA
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+3.0 kn	−97%	−96%	+1,569%	–	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 97%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−4.7 kn	+10,481%	+6,487%	−98%	–	4.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10,481%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	+16%	+5%	+146%	+15%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	−9%	−7%	−65%	−21%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+11%	+13%	−27%	+27%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−2.4 kn	+2%	−14%	+515%	−4%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024LNG	Seapeak Maritime (Glasgow) Ltd	11,443	32,562	11,346	1,059	10.7	1,009	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	25,673	70,655	680	88	7.7	37,755	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	15,117	43,396	42,369	3,412	12.4	357	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	5,306	14,602	17,257	1,263	13.7	308	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	16,646	46,097	49,134	3,700	13.3	339	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	20,594	56,998	67,320	5,181	13.0	306	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	3,269	9,068	10,948	709	15.4	299	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024LNG	Seapeak Maritime (Glasgow) Ltd	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	13.5	10.4	+30%	270 of 379	DNV	A+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	11.7	10.5	+12%	172 of 289	DNV	A+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	14.9	10.7	+39%	217 of 267	DNV	A+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	11.7	10.9	+7%	140 of 248	DNV	A+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	12.2	10.9	+11%	128 of 197	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.