Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

NORDIC GRACE

IMO
9230892
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
114,898 t
Flag (estimated)
Cayman Islands
Port of registry
Georgetown
Technical efficiency
EIV 3.87 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 71,702 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
178
Oil tanker median 138 kg/nm (+29%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
7.75
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.83 (−12%)
Average speed
11.7 kn
Oil tanker median 9.7 kn (+21%)
Fuel per day at sea
49.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
7,319 t
CO₂ emitted
22,842 t
Distance sailed
41,105 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,523 h
147 days, 40% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,870 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 189 kg/nm · median 134 (+41%)
81.5Ranks 1,604 of 1,870, lowest first204
Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 11.0 (+5%)
8.1Faster than 67% of oil tanker ships12.5
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 5.27 g CO₂/t·nm · median 9.03 (−42%)
4.81Ranks 247 of 1,870, lowest first26.3
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports7%
  • From the EU30%
  • Into the EU54%
  • At berth in the EU9%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2,163 t
9.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • NORDIC GRACE
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • NORDIC GRACE
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • NORDIC GRACE
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2019→2020−0.2 kn+6%+5%−66%−32%Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+0.3 kn−14%−13%+566%+67%Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2020not published2,6758,57714,1651,22911.51895.27–
2019not published7,31922,84241,1053,52311.71787.75–
2018not published1,2854,0136,16954011.42084.65–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2020not published5.279.03−42%247 of 1,870ABSA
2019not published7.758.83−12%766 of 1,919ABSA
2018not published4.658.86−48%213 of 1,779ABSA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.