Navalyze

Navalyze · Other · Ship

CSTAR VOYAGER

IMO
9231133
Type
Other ship types
Port of registry
Panama
Former names
MARIA LUISA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: El Reedy Shipping Agency

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
–
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
–
Fuel per day at sea
–
Fuel consumed
0 t
CO₂ emitted
0 t
0 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
–
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
0 h
0 days, 0% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2024

Set against all 189 other ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 91.7 kg/nm · median 72.5 (+26%)
42.2Ranks 133 of 189, lowest first142.3
Average speedThis ship 12.5 kn · median 11.1 (+13%)
8.5Faster than 67% of other ships14.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 21.69 g CO₂/t·nm · median 51.55 (−58%)
21.30Ranks 22 of 189, lowest first306.29
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

The voyage split is not in this year's report.

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
–
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • CSTAR VOYAGER
  • Other median

Average speed, kn

  • CSTAR VOYAGER
  • Other median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • CSTAR VOYAGER
  • Other median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025–––––
2023→2024+5.8 kn−6%+75%+21%–5.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−4.8 kn−7%−46%−22%–4.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022−0.6 kn+4%−1%−7%−8%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+2.9 kn+3%+35%+15%−33%2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−1.7 kn−11%−24%−5%−1%1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+9.7 kn−6%+767%+728%−39%9.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025El Reedy Shipping Agency00–0––––
2024part-yearPSL NAVEGACAO, SA4,10512,80444,7593,59212.591.721.69–
2024El Reedy Shipping Agency4,10512,80444,7593,59212.591.721.69–
2023not published3,62811,32137,0575,5636.797.9––
2022not published5,04815,74947,7814,14911.5105.7––
2021not published5,18516,16651,2214,22312.1101.2––
2020not published4,35813,59544,3774,8049.298.2––
2019not published5,15416,07046,8534,31810.9110.0––
2018not published6622,0855,6614,7861.2116.9––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOther medianvs OtherRankVerifierMethods
2025El Reedy Shipping Agency––––VerifaviaA
2024part-yearPSL NAVEGACAO, SA––––VerifaviaA
2024El Reedy Shipping Agency21.6951.55−58%22 of 189VerifaviaA
2023not published––––VerifaviaA
2022not published18.1021.57−16%362 of 1,034DNVA
2021not published19.6322.70−14%421 of 1,142DNVA
2020not published29.5124.50+20%788 of 1,167DNVA
2019not published29.7724.96+19%728 of 1,154DNVA
2018not published48.5424.89+95%903 of 1,044DNVA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

CSTAR VOYAGER (IMO 9231133): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze