Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

COTE DES DUNES

IMO
9232527
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
France
Port of registry
Le Havre
Technical efficiency
EEXI 26.75 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DFDS A/S · part of DFDS

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
179
Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+16%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
39.6
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (−95%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
3.48
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (−98%)
Average speed
13.1 kn
Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (−19%)
Fuel per day at sea
56.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
13,126 t
CO₂ emitted
40,882 t
Distance sailed
73,370 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,610 h
234 days, 64% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 164 kg/nm · median 150 (+9%)
69.3Ranks 251 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 15.8 (−18%)
12.0Faster than 16% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,106 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+95%)
66.8Ranks 320 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 131 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−48%)
48.6Ranks 126 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU47%
  • Into the EU48%
  • At berth in the EU5%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,864 t
4.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • COTE DES DUNES
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • COTE DES DUNES
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • COTE DES DUNES
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • COTE DES DUNES
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.2 kn−2%−1%+10%−3%Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−0.6 kn−2%−6%−13%+19%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−1.9 kn−7%−19%−10%−24%1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+2.2 kn+3%+21%−4%+3,081%2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−1.3 kn−3%−12%+2%−98%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+0.3 kn+4%+6%−7%+64%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019−0.3 kn−8%−11%+4%−60%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025DFDS A/S9,86630,75660,1934,62213.0164––
2024DFDS A/S9,20729,01954,8224,27312.8168––
2023not published10,81534,08363,1104,72013.4171––
2022not published12,94740,32570,1734,57615.3185––
2021not published13,12640,88273,3705,61013.1179––
2020not published13,26441,32271,7284,97414.4185––
2019not published13,66742,57876,7285,45414.1178––
2018not published14,30544,55473,6005,10214.4194358–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025DFDS A/S1,106567+95%320 of 408131253−48%DNVB
2024DFDS A/S1,140547+109%314 of 404132233−43%DNVC
2023not published955680+40%254 of 386202234−14%DNVB+C
2022not published1,260626+101%323 of 394222253−12%DNVB+C
2021not published39.6815−95%29 of 3773.48226−98%VerifaviaB+C
2020not published1,691751+125%308 of 387193217−11%VerifaviaB+C
2019not published1,033569+82%293 of 394208223−6%VerifaviaB+C
2018not published2,560729+251%319 of 361–––VerifaviaB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.