Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

APOLLO

IMO
9234628
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
12,653 t
Flag (estimated)
Portugal
Port of registry
Madeira
Technical efficiency
EIV 10.40 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,086 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
96.9
Chemical tanker median 88.3 kg/nm (+10%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
30.3
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.3 (+75%)
Average speed
5.2 kn
Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (−49%)
Fuel per day at sea
12.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
3,329 t
CO₂ emitted
10,488 t
Distance sailed
34,343 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
6,659 h
277 days, 76% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,409 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 98.3 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+16%)
57.0Ranks 1,005 of 1,409, lowest first117
Average speedThis ship 9.0 kn · median 11.1 (−19%)
8.9Faster than 12% of chemical tanker ships12.5
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.1 (+53%)
9.04Ranks 1,040 of 1,409, lowest first40.6
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports78%
  • From the EU3%
  • Into the EU7%
  • At berth in the EU13%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,319 t
12.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • APOLLO
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • APOLLO
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • APOLLO
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2021→2022+1.5 kn+16%+40%+13%+7%1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−2.8 kn−3%−29%−46%−18%2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+5.1 kn−11%+78%+20%−8%5.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+0.4 kn+8%+17%+9%−15%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2022not published2,4507,73224,9342,7609.098.324.5–
2021not published1,8615,89222,0262,9467.584.522.8–
2020not published3,56311,42241,1103,99610.386.727.8–
2019not published3,32910,48834,3436,6595.296.930.3–
2018not published2,8198,91231,4026,5704.889.835.5–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2022not published24.516.1+53%1,040 of 1,409DNVB
2021not published22.816.7+37%929 of 1,343DNVB
2020not published27.816.2+72%1,025 of 1,312DNVB
2019not published30.317.3+75%1,046 of 1,321DNVB
2018not published35.517.1+107%1,078 of 1,294DNVB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.