Navalyze · Container · Ship

AURORA

IMO: 9234989
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,899 t
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: Saint John'S
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TAS Transatlantische Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,066 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

78.0

Container median 165 kg/nm (−53%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

61.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (+217%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,305 t

CO₂ emitted

10,592 t

Distance sailed

42,361 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,053 h

169 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 90.8 kg/nm · median 177 (−49%)

78.8Ranks 413 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 13.3 (−23%)

9.1Faster than 16% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 58.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+260%)

7.22Ranks 2,102 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports46%
From the EU23%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

991 t

9.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AURORA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AURORA
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AURORA
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	+12%	+1%	−47%	+17%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	+4%	+12%	+5%	−19%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.5 kn	−3%	−15%	+11%	+25%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+5%	+1%	+0%	+6%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	+3%	−4%	−34%	+23%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+7.0 kn	−12%	+85%	+64%	−30%	7.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	+4%	+9%	+13%	+22%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TAS Transatlantische Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	2,143	6,775	23,601	2,323	10.2	90.8	58.6	–
2024	TAS Transatlantische Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	3,627	11,500	44,548	3,975	11.2	81.4	50.1	–
2023	not published	3,305	10,592	42,361	4,053	10.5	78.0	61.5	–
2022	not published	3,077	9,833	38,286	3,201	12.0	80.4	49.2	–
2021	not published	2,943	9,434	38,249	3,089	12.4	76.9	46.4	–
2020	not published	4,319	13,848	58,051	4,334	13.4	74.4	37.9	–
2019	not published	2,985	9,530	35,327	5,561	6.4	84.5	54.1	–
2018	not published	2,539	8,021	31,210	5,172	6.0	81.3	44.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TAS Transatlantische Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	58.6	16.3	+260%	2,102 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	TAS Transatlantische Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	50.1	17.5	+186%	1,753 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	61.5	19.4	+217%	1,796 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	49.2	19.1	+157%	1,593 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	46.4	17.9	+159%	1,555 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	37.9	17.6	+116%	1,448 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	54.1	18.9	+187%	1,595 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	44.4	20.2	+119%	1,405 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.