Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

SEAPEAK CATALUNYA

IMO: 9236420
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Spain
Port of registry: Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.61 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG
Former names: CATALUNYA SPIRIT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Seapeak Maritime (Glasgow) Ltd · part of Seapeak

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

316

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (+6%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

11.9

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (+11%)

Average speed

14.4 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

108.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,918 t

CO₂ emitted

16,393 t

Distance sailed

18,750 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,304 h

54 days, 15% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 453 kg/nm · median 205 (+121%)

148Ranks 308 of 312, lowest first328

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 14.6 (−23%)

11.0Faster than 11% of LNG carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 24.4 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (+231%)

4.54Ranks 292 of 312, lowest first17.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU44%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

316 t

1.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SEAPEAK CATALUNYA
LNG carrier median

200.0300.0400.0500.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

SEAPEAK CATALUNYA
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

SEAPEAK CATALUNYA
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−3.3 kn	+25%	−4%	−25%	+114%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	+4%	+8%	−4%	−22%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−2.3 kn	+6%	−9%	+10%	+23%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.9 kn	+4%	+18%	+128%	+0%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+3%	+3%	−28%	+46%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024LNG	Seapeak Maritime (Glasgow) Ltd	15,459	45,182	34,146	3,044	11.2	453	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	16,433	45,536	45,237	3,117	14.5	363	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	16,495	46,935	47,020	3,366	14.0	351	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	14,068	39,759	42,691	2,626	16.3	330	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	5,918	16,393	18,750	1,304	14.4	316	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	8,038	22,332	26,174	1,832	14.3	307	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024LNG	Seapeak Maritime (Glasgow) Ltd	24.4	7.39	+231%	292 of 312	DNV	A+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	11.4	9.10	+26%	252 of 355	DNV	A+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	14.6	10.4	+41%	292 of 379	DNV	A+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	11.9	10.5	+14%	177 of 289	DNV	A+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	11.9	10.7	+11%	167 of 267	DNV	A+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	8.15	10.9	−25%	53 of 248	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.