Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GALEA

IMO: 9236614
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EIV 11.72 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

275

LNG carrier median 323 kg/nm (−15%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

11.4

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (+4%)

Average speed

14.4 kn

LNG carrier median 13.7 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

95.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,625 t

CO₂ emitted

37,858 t

Distance sailed

49,514 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,428 h

143 days, 39% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2019

Set against all 248 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 303 kg/nm · median 308 (−2%)

206Ranks 114 of 248, lowest first418

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 13.5 (−20%)

10.6Faster than 12% of LNG carrier ships15.5

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 17.3 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.9 (+59%)

6.45Ranks 213 of 248, lowest first22.4

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU47%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

6,881 t

51% of all fuel; 50% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

939 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GALEA
LNG carrier median

260.0280.0300.0320.0340.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

GALEA
LNG carrier median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

GALEA
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2018→2019	−3.6 kn	+10%	−18%	+29%	+52%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2019LNG / alt.	not published	19,399	54,379	64,030	5,919	10.8	303	–	41%
2018LNG / alt.	not published	13,625	37,858	49,514	3,428	14.4	275	–	51%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019LNG / alt.	not published	17.3	10.9	+59%	213 of 248	Lloyd's Register	B
2018LNG / alt.	not published	11.4	10.9	+4%	114 of 197	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.