Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

CRACOVIA

IMO: 9237242
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 28.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Polska Zegluga Baltycka S.A.

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

137

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−11%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

111

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (−86%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

480

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (+112%)

Average speed

13.4 kn

Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (−17%)

Fuel per day at sea

44.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,598 t

CO₂ emitted

27,148 t

Distance sailed

62,573 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,660 h

194 days, 53% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 142 kg/nm · median 150 (−5%)

69.3Ranks 172 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 16.6 kn · median 15.8 (+5%)

12.0Faster than 59% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 54.0 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−90%)

66.8Ranks 28 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 668 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+164%)

48.6Ranks 302 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports85%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU15%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4,045 t

14.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CRACOVIA
Ro-pax median

120.0130.0140.0150.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CRACOVIA
Ro-pax median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

CRACOVIA
Ro-pax median

0.0200400600800

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

CRACOVIA
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.5 kn	−4%	+14%	+49%	−52%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	+14%	+23%	−18%	+7%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+2.5 kn	+1%	+25%	+9%	+5%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.8 kn	−7%	−27%	−7%	−10%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+2%	+9%	+0%	−5%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	−4%	−10%	−0%	+202%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−3%	−3%	+5%	−77%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Polska Zegluga Baltycka S.A.	10,959	34,866	76,951	4,630	16.6	142	–	–
2024	Polska Zegluga Baltycka S.A.	7,618	23,938	51,529	3,660	14.1	148	–	–
2023	not published	8,186	25,806	63,157	4,839	13.1	130	–	–
2022	not published	7,419	23,384	57,933	5,483	10.6	128	–	–
2021	not published	8,598	27,148	62,573	4,660	13.4	137	–	–
2020	not published	8,373	26,388	62,366	4,942	12.6	134	–	–
2019	not published	8,762	27,609	62,646	4,637	13.5	140	–	–
2018	not published	8,553	26,981	59,534	4,394	13.5	144	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Polska Zegluga Baltycka S.A.	54.0	567	−90%	28 of 408	668	253	+164%	DNV	A
2024	Polska Zegluga Baltycka S.A.	111	547	−80%	87 of 404	678	233	+191%	DNV	A
2023	not published	104	680	−85%	62 of 386	531	234	+127%	DNV	A
2022	not published	99.5	626	−84%	69 of 394	472	253	+87%	DNV	A
2021	not published	111	815	−86%	70 of 377	480	226	+112%	DNV	A
2020	not published	117	751	−84%	82 of 387	482	217	+122%	DNV	A+B
2019	not published	38.7	569	−93%	46 of 394	535	223	+140%	DNV	A+B
2018	not published	169	729	−77%	89 of 361	228	184	+24%	DNV	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.