Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

EXCELSIOR

IMO: 9239616
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Belgium
Port of registry: Antwerpen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.59 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Excelerate Technical Management BV

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

507

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+120%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

823

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+8,940%)

Average speed

6.6 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−54%)

Fuel per day at sea

80.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,053 t

CO₂ emitted

12,368 t

Distance sailed

7,994 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,215 h

51 days, 14% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 507 kg/nm · median 231 (+120%)

167Ranks 353 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 6.6 kn · median 14.2 (−54%)

10.7Faster than 1% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 823 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+8,940%)

5.47Ranks 354 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports43%
From the EU50%
Into the EU3%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

465 t

3.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EXCELSIOR
LNG carrier median

0.02,0004,0006,000

’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

EXCELSIOR
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	+1,005%	+1,363%	−98%	–	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 1,005%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	Excelerate Technical Management BV	846	2,713	151	17	8.7	5,603	–	–
2023	not published	4,053	12,368	7,994	1,215	6.6	507	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Excelerate Technical Management BV	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	823	9.10	+8,940%	354 of 355	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.