Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC PAMIRA III

IMO: 9239903
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 17,990 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.06 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: AS PAMIRA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,305 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

133

Container median 182 kg/nm (−27%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

29.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+44%)

Average speed

15.2 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

48.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,491 t

CO₂ emitted

32,752 t

Distance sailed

78,786 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,169 h

215 days, 59% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 98.2 kg/nm · median 177 (−45%)

78.8Ranks 512 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 13.3 (−28%)

9.1Faster than 13% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+7%)

7.22Ranks 1,186 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU45%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,722 t

8.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC PAMIRA III
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC PAMIRA III
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC PAMIRA III
Container median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	−1%	−12%	+117%	+27%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	−20%	−10%	−11%	−43%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	+6%	+1%	−43%	+7%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−12%	−17%	−44%	−22%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.9 kn	−4%	−19%	+225%	−22%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+13%	+15%	−74%	+51%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−2.9 kn	−7%	−25%	−34%	−15%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	2,737	8,757	27,878	2,892	9.6	98.2	17.5	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	1,274	3,984	12,822	1,190	10.8	99.4	13.7	–
2023	not published	1,784	5,636	14,356	1,498	9.6	124	24.3	–
2022	not published	2,940	9,278	24,999	2,506	10.0	118	22.6	–
2021	not published	5,954	18,790	44,355	4,187	10.6	134	29.1	–
2020	not published	1,916	5,984	13,640	1,095	12.5	140	37.4	–
2019	not published	6,440	20,093	52,041	4,222	12.3	124	24.8	–
2018	not published	10,491	32,752	78,786	5,169	15.2	133	29.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	17.5	16.3	+7%	1,186 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	13.7	17.5	−22%	736 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	24.3	19.4	+25%	1,158 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	22.6	19.1	+18%	1,062 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	29.1	17.9	+62%	1,277 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	37.4	17.6	+113%	1,439 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	24.8	18.9	+31%	1,116 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	29.1	20.2	+44%	1,153 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.