Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

UNDINE

IMO: 9240160
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 3,047 t
Flag (estimated): Sweden
Port of registry: Stockholm
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.34 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: WALL RO/RO AB

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,189 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

119

Vehicle carrier median 104 kg/nm (+14%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

52.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 62.4 (−16%)

Average speed

15.3 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.7 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

44.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,683 t

CO₂ emitted

20,970 t

Distance sailed

56,005 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,649 h

152 days, 42% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 112 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+12%)

79.6Ranks 413 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 14.4 (+5%)

12.0Faster than 71% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 114 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+106%)

34.7Ranks 434 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU28%
Into the EU56%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

694 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

UNDINE
Vehicle carrier median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

UNDINE
Vehicle carrier median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

UNDINE
Vehicle carrier median

20.040.060.080.0100120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	+9%	+16%	+44%	+63%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	−7%	−13%	−61%	+88%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+1.0 kn	−9%	−3%	+146%	−3%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+1%	+5%	−24%	−32%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+0%	+6%	+15%	+13%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.2 kn	+4%	−11%	−70%	+6%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−3%	−5%	+10%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	WALL RO/RO AB	2,519	7,849	22,552	1,489	15.1	112	114	–
2024	WALL RO/RO AB	1,613	5,091	15,690	1,109	14.1	103	70.2	–
2023	not published	4,446	14,056	40,022	2,677	15.0	111	37.4	–
2022	not published	1,985	6,216	16,262	1,159	14.0	122	38.6	–
2021	not published	2,601	8,166	21,508	1,594	13.5	121	57.1	–
2020	not published	2,250	7,104	18,688	1,454	12.9	120	50.5	–
2019	not published	7,091	22,244	61,326	4,071	15.1	116	47.9	–
2018	not published	6,683	20,970	56,005	3,649	15.3	119	52.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	WALL RO/RO AB	114	55.4	+106%	434 of 506	DNV	C
2024	WALL RO/RO AB	70.2	55.3	+27%	227 of 335	DNV	C
2023	not published	37.4	56.6	−34%	35 of 417	DNV	C
2022	not published	38.6	57.7	−33%	36 of 463	Lloyd's Register	C
2021	not published	57.1	59.6	−4%	210 of 459	Lloyd's Register	C
2020	not published	50.5	57.3	−12%	154 of 449	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2019	not published	47.9	59.0	−19%	83 of 426	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	52.1	62.4	−16%	101 of 434	Lloyd's Register	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.